Category Archives: Employment Discrimination

I’ve Been Offered a Severance Agreement… Now What?

While there is no state or federal law that requires employers to offer former employees a severance, it is not uncommon for a severance package to be offered to certain employees who have been terminated or laid off.  A severance payment is most often made in exchange for a former employee’s release of any and all claims that he or she may have against the employer.  However, the fact that a severance has been offered does not indicate that the employer has done anything wrong, and it rarely can be used as any sort of evidence of wrongdoing against the employer.  When a severance is offered, it will be provided for in a written agreement that is most likely titled one of the following: Separation Agreement, Severance Agreement, or Release Agreement. 

What am I giving up in exchange for signing a Severance Agreement?

Without seeing the actual document, it is impossible to know or suggest exactly what you may be releasing in exchange for your severance payment.  However, generally speaking, the majority of severance agreements contain relatively standard release language that will release virtually all claims that you may have against the employer.  This will almost certainly include discrimination and retaliation claims under both state and federal laws (e.g. Chapter 21 of the Texas Labor Code and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964), as well as claims for breach of contract, negligence, and assault. Before signing a severance agreement, it is important to understand what claims, if any, you may have.

Is it possible to negotiate a Severance Agreement?

Like any negotiation, it is subject to both parties being willing to participate in the process.  There are a few ways that you may be able to negotiate a severance. 

  1. First, you can argue from a strictly fairness standpoint that the severance payment should be higher, or that certain terms should be added/amended to the agreement.  This obviously is not a great bargaining position to be in.  The next two options for negotiating a severance are most successful when presented through an employment attorney
  2. You can attempt to negotiate a severance based on contractual language between the employee and employer.  For this to work, there must have been a verbal or written agreement between the parties stipulating what severance will be paid upon the employment separation. 
  3. Finally, employers are oftentimes (although not always) willing to negotiate a severance based on the threat of some valid legal claim against the company.  These  are most often discrimination and/or retaliation claims, but must be evaluated on a case by case basis. 

Regardless of whether or not you believe you have a legal claim against your former employer, you should always attempt to have an attorney review a severance agreement before you sign.  An attorney can advise you of any concerns related to the language in the agreement, and also let you know if there is any basis for potentially negotiating. 

For more information contact an employment attorney to see what options may follow a severance agreement.
Blog Buttons (2)

Did you find this content helpful? Share it...

Is Alcoholism a Disability Under Texas State or Federal Law?

The former head football coach for the University of Southern California, Steve Sarkisian, has filed a state lawsuit in California alleging, among other claims, that he was discriminated against based on his alcoholism.  Not only does he claim that he was terminated because of his alcoholism, but he has also alleged that USC failed to provide him with a reasonable accommodation.  The lawsuit has only recently been filed, but USC has already released a statement characterizing much of it as “patently untrue.”

Is Alcoholism Considered a Disability in Texas?

While this lawsuit was filed under a state law in California, it is an interesting example of what may be considered to be a disability under state law in Texas or federal law, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).  While the ADA does not list every possible disability, the EEOC has determined that alcoholism is a recognized disability under the ADA.  However, an evaluation must be done on a case by case basis to determine whether or not an employee does, in fact, suffer from alcoholism and whether or not the employer was aware of the disability and discriminated against the employee.  Additionally, the ADA protects employees from discrimination when the employer regards the employee as disability.

Alcoholism and the ADA

Under the ADA, “disability” is defined as (a)

  • “a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities”
  • “a record of impairment; or 
  • “being regarded as having such an impairment.”  42 U.S.C. § 121012

Major life activities include, but are not limited to, “caring for oneself, performing manual tasks, seeing, hearing, eating, sleeping, walking, standing, lifting, bending, speaking, breathing, learning, reading, concentrating, thinking, communicating, and working.” 

Once an employee has shown that he/she has a disability under the ADA, the employee must next show that he/she is qualified to perform the essential functions of the position.  This can be a much more difficult burden for someone, like Coach Sarkisian, trying to pursue a claim of discrimination based on alcoholism as a disability.  Essential functions of a job may include regular attendance and being on time to work.  For someone suffering from alcoholism, these may be difficult requirements to meet. 

Finally, an employee pursuing a claim of discrimination based on alcoholism must be able to show that the employer could have provided a reasonable accommodation.  While there is not an exhaustive list of what accommodations are reasonable, one of the most common accommodations for someone suffering from alcoholism is allowing the employee to take paid or unpaid leave for medical treatment or counseling.  Additionally, under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), an employee suffering from alcoholism may be eligible to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid job protected leave in order to deal with his/her alcoholism.  Figuring out if an accommodation is reasonable and if an employer is even obligated to provide an employee with an accommodation is a very fact specific question and must be done on a case by case basis.    

Protect Your Job

Alcoholism can be a very debilitating disease that affects a person’s family, friends, job, and life in general.  In addition to getting the help one needs to treat the alcoholism, it is important to take the necessary steps to best protect one’s job.  If you believe that you have been discriminated against in the workplace because of your alcoholism, or if your employer is refusing to provide you with what you believe to be a reasonable accommodation, it is imperative that you understand your legal rights.  An employment lawyer in your area can advise you of those rights.

Did you find this content helpful? Share it...
ethical behavior in the workplace

I’ve Been Instructed by my Boss to do Something Illegal. What are my Rights?

First, you should always be very careful if you have been instructed by someone in your company to do something that is illegal.  If you follow through on performing the illegal act, there is the possibility that you could personally suffer the criminal consequences.  Ultimately, you really have two options:

  1. you can follow the order and commit an illegal act or,
  2. you can refuse to perform the illegal act and risk being fired.

Neither of these may seem like very good options, but you should never agree to do something criminal just because you are instructed to.  When in doubt, you can always reach out to an employment lawyer in your area to discuss your legal rights and options.

Texas Law for Refusing Illegal Act

While Texas is an at-will employment state, the Texas Supreme Court has created a public policy exception to this rule.  In Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. Hauck, the Texas Supreme Court found that an employee cannot be fired for refusing to perform an illegal act.  In the Sabine Pilot case, the plaintiff, a deckhand, was fired after refusing to illegally pump boat bilges into the water.  The Court found that the employee could not be fired because he refused to commit the illegal act.  However, this exception to the at-will doctrine is limited to situations in which the employee can show that he/she was terminated based on a refusal to commit an illegal act, and that refusal was the sole reason that he/she was terminated.  If the employer can put forth evidence of some other legitimate reason for termination, the Sabine Pilot claim may fail.

What steps do I take if I am asked to do something illegal?

If you are instructed to do something illegal, you should first refuse. 

  • It is best to have documentation of the request to perform the illegal act and your refusal to perform the illegal act. 
  • This documentation can be in the form of an email to your supervisor or HR, a handwritten or typewritten letter/memo to your supervisor or HR, or an audio recording of the conversation. 
  • It is best to maintain a copy of the documentation for yourself should anything happen to your employment situation.

After refusing to perform the illegal act and documenting your refusal, your next action will likely depend upon your employer’s response to your refusal.  If your employer does nothing to discipline or otherwise retaliate against you, then it may not be necessary for you to do anything from an employment law standpoint. 

However, if someone else at the company moves forward with committing the illegal act, you may choose to report the illegal act to the appropriate governmental entity (e.g. OSHA, DOJ, or DOL). If you were fired for refusing to do something illegal, or even if your employer threatens you with disciplinary action or termination, you should immediately contact an employment lawyer to discuss pursuing legal action.

Did you find this content helpful? Share it...

What is the Association Provision of the Americans with Disabilities Act?

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) protects employees from discrimination because of a disability.  This federal law applies to employers with 15 or more employees.  In addition to the ADA’s protections against discrimination based on an employee’s personal disability, it also has a section known as the “association provision” that protects employees from discrimination based on their relationship or association with another individual with a disability.  While the ADA does not require that the individual be a family member, these claims most often arise based on the disability of a family member. Under this provision:

  • An employer cannot fire you
  • Refuse to promote you
  • Deny you any other employee benefit because of your association with someone with a disability. 

For example, if your employer provides health insurance to all employees, they cannot refuse to provide you with health insurance because they find out that your spouse has cancer.  Your employer must treat you the same as it treats other employees, regardless of the disability. 

Does my employer have to provide me with a reasonable accommodation because of my relationship with someone with a disability?

The short answer is no.  Unlike a situation where an employee personally has a disability,

  • An employer is not required under the ADA to provide an employee with a reasonable accommodation because that employee’s spouse or child has a disability. 
  • The employer is not required by the ADA to provide an employee with leave because of the employee’s relationship with someone who has a disability. 

However, an employer cannot implement its leave policy in a discriminatory way.

For example, if an employee requests days off of work to care for a family member who has a disability, the employer must treat that request as it would treat any other request for days off of work.

*Unlike the ADA, the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) does require certain employers to provide up to twelve weeks of leave for an employee to care for a family member who suffers from a medical condition.

What do you do if you are experiencing discrimination based on your relationship with someone who has a disability?

As with other forms of discrimination, it is important to make a complaint when you believe you are suffering from discriminatory treatment.  If you are being harassed or denied leave because of your association or relationship with someone who has a disability, you must complain.  When you make a complaint about discriminatory treatment, the ADA protects you from retaliation by your employer.  You have the right to complain internally to your employer’s HR department, or you can complain to the Texas Workforce Commission, Civil Rights Division, or EEOC.  Talking to an experienced employment attorney either before or after making a complaint of discrimination can give you a better understanding of your rights.

Did you find this content helpful? Share it...
fair-chance-hiring

City of Austin Passes Fair Chance Hiring Ordinance

The City of Austin is “banning the box” with its new employment Fair Chance Hiring Ordinance that was approved by an 8-2 vote on March 24, 2016.  The new Ordinance will prohibit companies with 15 or more employees from questioning a job applicant about his/her criminal history until after a conditional job offer has been made.  The purpose of the Ordinance is to give all individuals with criminal histories an equal opportunity in obtaining employment.  

What is the Current Law in Texas?

Currently, Texas law does not prohibit discrimination towards an employee or job applicant because of that individual’s criminal background.  Therefore, an employee in Texas has no legal recourse under state law if he/she is denied employment based on something in his/her criminal record. 

While there is no state or federal law in Texas explicitly prohibiting discrimination based on an applicant or employee’s criminal history, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has issued guidance regarding the use of arrest and conviction records in employment decisions based on the discriminatory impact that criminal background check policies often have.  Because minorities are imprisoned at a disproportionate rate, minorities tend to suffer more based on background check policies.  However, this EEOC guidance does not prohibit the use of criminal background checks in employment decisions. 

What Does the Ordinance Do?

  • The City of Austin Fair Chance Hiring Ordinance will only apply to those businesses within the City of Austin that have 15 or more employees. 
  • The Ordinance only applies during the application process. 
  • There is no prohibition against an employer firing an employee based on the discovery of some criminal history. 
  • The law also does not prohibit an employer from revoking a job offer based on information obtained after a conditional offer has been made.     

The Ordinance is not a state or federal law, so it does not give a job applicant the legal right to file a lawsuit if a company is in violation.  An individual who believes that a company is in violation of the Ordinance will have the ability to file a complaint with the City.  Ultimately, a company found to be in violation could face a $500 penalty.   

Employee Rights

While the City of Austin Ordinance will potentially have an impact on the questions that applicants in Austin, Texas see when applying for jobs, it will do little to expand on the legal protections that employees in this State have from discriminatory treatment.  If you believe that you have been discriminated against based on a company’s use of criminal history information, it is important that you speak with an employment lawyer to understand your rights. 

Did you find this content helpful? Share it...
Filing a Complaint

Filing A Complaint Against An Employer

The first step in determining how you go about filing a complaint against an employer is to figure out what type of complaint you are choosing to pursue.  There are different legal requirements or limitations deadlines depending on the type of complaint, and various state and federal agencies have the authority to investigate depending on the type of complaint.  Because the legal requirements are different depending on the type of complaint, it is always important to speak with a knowledgeable employment attorney in your area to know your legal rights and options.  The following are examples of the complaint process for various employment claims:

Discrimination or Retaliatoin

Discrimination and retaliation complaints must be filed with the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).  A complaint must be filed with the TWC within 180 days of the most recent incident of discrimination and with the EEOC within 300 days of the most recent incident of discrimination.  The complaint document that an employee files is called a Charge of Discrimination, and it must be filed within the above time periods to have a viable claim.  The TWC or EEOC will investigate the allegations and ultimately issue a right to sue which gives the employee the legal right to file a lawsuit.

Wage Claim

A federal wage claim is brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and filed with the Department of Labor (DOL).  The FLSA covers minimum wage requirements, overtime pay, exempt versus non-exempt status, and equal pay.

A wage claim can also be filed with the TWC pursuant to the Texas Payday Law.  The Texas Payday Law covers the timely payment of wages, deductions from wages, compensable time, enforcement of a wage agreement, and final pay.

Once a claim is filed with either the DOL or TWC, the agency conducts an investigation to determine whether or not the employee is owed any unpaid wages.

Whistleblower Claim

The Texas Whistleblower Act covers public employees in Texas who have (1) reported in good faith what he/she believes to be a violation of federal or state law, a local government ordinance, or a rule adopted under a law or an ordinance (2) to an appropriate law enforcement authority, and (3) been suspended, terminated, or adversely affected by another personnel action for having reported the violation.  If the public employee is suspended, terminated, or adversely affected, he or she must first file a grievance or appeal with the employer within 90 days of the violation (if the employer has a grievance policy or appeal procedure).  Finally, the public employee must file a lawsuit under the Texas Whistleblower Act within 90 days of the violation (not including the time spent in the employer’s grievance/appeal procedure).

OSHA Violation

The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) is meant to prevent workers from being subjected to unsafe working conditions.  Employees have the right to complain directly to their employer about perceived OSHA violations or file a complaint directly with the Occupational Safety & Health Administration.

If an employee is fired, demoted, transferred, or discriminated against in another way for having filed an OSHA complaint, the employee has the right to file a discrimination complaint with OSHA within 30 days of the alleged retaliation.

Before filing any complaint, consult with an employment attorney in your area to best understand your legal rights and obligations.

Did you find this content helpful? Share it...